The Audit

The Audit

Share this post

The Audit
The Audit
Do High-Rise Developments Depress Fertility Rates?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Do High-Rise Developments Depress Fertility Rates?

David Clinton's avatar
David Clinton
Jan 02, 2025
∙ Paid
8

Share this post

The Audit
The Audit
Do High-Rise Developments Depress Fertility Rates?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
11
2
Share

Canada’s sharp downward trend in fertility rates has appeared in this space before. For many reasons I see this as a looming crisis. Here, to refresh your memory, is how Canadian fertility rates per female have looked since 1991:

The Audit is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Output image

From a policy perspective, we should be thinking about creating economic and social conditions that encourage larger families. The problem is that the tools we’ve been using for many decades - like child tax credits, paid family leave, and subsidized childcare - simply haven’t worked to solve this particular problem.

So we could either throw up our hands in failure or look for something new. One area that would seem to be both relevant and within the scope of government responsibility is housing density. For example, is it wise for any level of government to push high-density, high-rise development at the expense of single-detached homes?

Intuitively I’d say that this is a no-brainer. Given a choice, which family wants to raise three or four kids in a 12th floor condo or rental? How many condos and rental properties of that size even allow occupancy with three or four kids? With that in mind, we would expect residential areas with more taller buildings to be less attractive to larger families.

2021 Census data available from Statistics Canada should be able to help us here. I identified the percentage of apartments in buildings that have five or more storeys and the average family size of couple-with-children economic families for each of Canada’s electoral districts. I’d expect ridings with a greater percentage of high-rise apartments to have a smaller average family size.

I was wrong.

The correlation coefficient between the percentage of apartments in buildings with five or more storeys and the average family size is approximately -0.224. This indicates a weak negative correlation, suggesting that as the proportion of high-density housing increases, the average family size slightly decreases. But the relationship is not strong enough to suggest a clear, reliable pattern. This scatter plot shows us the results:

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Audit to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 DBC Technology Services Inc
Publisher Terms
Substack
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More